Air Naturel GOTA Ultrasonic Air Humidifier User Manual Page 291

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 328
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 290
IV Congreso Internacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos - Córdoba, Argentina 14 a 16 de Noviembre de 2012
281
yeast extract, pH adjusted to 6.0, as proposed by Papanikolau et al. (2002), using raw glycerol as the main
carbon source. The suspension was incubated at 30°C in a rotary shaker with agitation rate at 180 rpm,
monitoring the cell concentration by counting in a Neubauer chamber.
The cultures were performed in 500 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 200 ml growth medium resulting of
add culture medium, yeast suspension and sterile distilled water. The culture medium was prepared in
concentrated form in order to result the following composition (g/L) proposed by Levinson et al. (2007): 40
raw glycerol, 1.7 KH
2
PO
4
; 12 Na
2
HPO
4
; 1.25 MgSO
4
.7H
2
O; 0.25 yeast extract; 0.006 thiamine; 0.25
(NH
4
)
2
SO
4
; pH adjusted to 6.0. The cultures was inoculated with yeast suspension previously prepared to
achieve 1x10
7
cells mL
-1
and maintained in an rotary shaker at 30 °C shaker with agitation rate at 180 rpm,
removing aliquots in the time intervals previously established, and samples were centrifuged at 1780 x g for
15 min.
Analysis determinations
The cell concentration was estimated by optical density at 680 nm using a methodology cited by Choi and
Park (2003). The biomass obtained was washed, centrifuged again at 1780 x g for 15 min and suspended in
appropriate volume to determine the cell concentration by optical density at 680 nm (spectrophotometer
Biospectro SP-220, China). The cell concentration was expressed as dry weight (g L
-1
), obtained from a
calibration curve previously determined for each microorganism. The pH was determined using a digital
potentiometer (Marte MB-10, Brazil) and the concentrations of citric acid and isocitric acid were determined
by enzymatic kits (R-Biopharm, Germany)
Statistical analysis
Experiments were performed in triplicate and the values were informed as means ± standard derivation. The
results were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test in order to verify significant
differences regarding the different in the concentration of citric and isocitric acid among yeasts tested, at
95% confidence level (p ≤ 0.05).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The monitoring of cell concentration and pH during cultivation for the six yeasts strains can be viewed in
Figure 1a and 1b, respectively.
Figure 1: Cell concentration c (A) e pH (B) Medium of cultivation for yeast using glycerin as main carbon
source. Abbreviation: Y.L. yarrowia lipolytica; C.L. candida lipolytica, C.O. candida oleophila and C.C. c.
Regarding the cell concentration, it was found that maximum biomass produced by yeasts reached values of
5.16 ±0.21 g L
-1
, 7.80 ±0.11 g L
-1
, 7.33 ±0.21 g L
-1
, 7.16 ±0.16 g L
-1
,12.83
±0.61 g L
-1
e 8.51±0.41 gL
-1
for Y.
lipolytica Y-1094, Y. lipolytica YB-423, Y. lipolytica Y-11853, C. lipolytica Y-1095, C. oleophila Y-2317,
C. cylindracea Y-17506, respectively, at 216 h cultivation. In relation to the pH, more pronounced variation
was observed for the yeasts Y. lipolytica Y-1094, Y. lipolytica YB-423, Y. lipolytica Y-11853 and C.
lipolytica Y-1095, 3.08, 3.27, 3.65 e 3.34, respectively.
0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240
Time (hour)
2,5
3,0
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
5,5
6,0
6,5
pH
Y,L yb-423
Y.L.y-1094
Y.L y-11853
C.L y-1095
C.O.y-2317
C.C.y-17506
( B )
0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240
Time (hour)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Cell concentration (g/L)
Y.L yb-423
Y.L y-1094
Y.L y-11853
C.L y-1095
C.O y-2317
C.C y-17506
( A )
Page view 290
1 2 ... 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 ... 327 328

Comments to this Manuals

No comments